Latest Articles

Posts Tagged with "World XC"

Who's up for cross country: A Column By Len Johnson

posted by rtross on March 14, 2011, 3:56pm


Those who come to the world cross-country championships in Punta Umbria, Spain, next weekend will be there to praise the event, not to bury it.

Make no mistake, however, cross-country, or rather the world cross-country, is critically ill, with European support for the event collapsing and showing no sign of recovering. The oxygen of publicity, once largely provided by European television networks, has been shut off.

From this year, the championships will go on to a two-year cycle, in the hope that continental championships will fill the gap and provide a pathway to the world event. There are also continued attempts to get cross-country onto the winter Olympic program, which would certainly boost its profile again.

It’s not as if the alarm bells haven’t been ringing. Four years ago, Mombasa provided the magnificent backdrop of the Indian Ocean, huge crowds of passionate Kenyan spectators, the dethroning of the (then) five-time world champion Kenenisa Bekele – and precious few Europeans. The highest placegetter representing Europe in the men’s race was Britain’s Mo Farah in 11th. African-born runners filled the first 39 places.

Three years ago in Edinburgh, no less a figure than Sebastian Coe spoke up for cross-country at the pre-championships press conference, saying it had been critical in his development as a middle-distance runner and that, in his view, it remained the basis for developing middle and long-distance runners. In the senior men’s race the first non-African finisher was 19th; the first European, 24th.

A year later, the championships went to Amman, the sort of exotic location distance runners used to love to go to – as a distance runner, I was raised on stories of Australia’s first participation in Rabat, Morocco, in 1975. Again Europeans were notably absent, with real or imagined security fears being added to the list of excuses. The first European in the senior men was 26th.

Last year, the championships went to Bydgoszcz in Poland, with the promise of mud (maybe even snow) and jumps to lure the traditionalists back. Poland sent a full team – natch – but few other European federations bothered. Simon Bairu of Canada was 13th, Farah 20th: both are African born.

It’s not as if European cross-country is not doing well. Cross-country events haven’t been immune from the channelling of more and more money into the professional football codes, but Europe still supports a full calendar of cross-country events. The European championships, too, are thriving. It is just that few of the runners and countries who take part turn up to the world cross-country a few months later.

Europeans in general, it seems, have given up on being competitive in distance running on the world stage. It doesn’t matter whether it’s cross-country or track. This attitude persists in the face of the evidence provided by Craig Mottram, Chris Solinsky, Matt Tegenkamp and Dathan Ritzenhein, to name a few, that it is possible to compete well against the east African runners.

It is not just a defeatist attitude that is dragging cross-country down. Fewer coaches, and hardly any athletes’ agents, see cross-country as an ideal lead-up for the northern hemisphere marathons.

In Gateshead in 1983, Carlos Lopes finished second in the men’s race, Albert Salazar fourth and Rob de Castella sixth. A few weeks later, ‘Deek’ out-lasted Lopes to win a memorable Rotterdam marathon, with Salazar falling away late in the race to finish fifth.

These days, however, runners are advised to forget the cross-country as a lead-up to a marathon. Few of those following this advice are as good as de Castella, Lopes or Salazar in absolute, much less relative, terms.

Back then, few races clashed directly with the world cross-country. Now, they do, Next weekend sees major half-marathons in Lisbon and New York. New York features Farah and Galen Rupp, two athletes who might otherwise be in Punta Umbria and, in terms of preparation for Daegu and London, might be better off for it.

Indeed, a look at the medallists and finalists in track distance events at recent major championships would suggest that Punta Umbria is the best place to be in late March if you want to do well on the track six months later.

Some argue that 12k cross-country for men, or 8km for women, requires different training than say 1500 or 5000. Yet many middle-distance athletes thrived on cross-country. Coe used it as part of his winter preparation, so too John Walker (4th in Rabat in 1975), Steve Ovett (4th in an English national over 14k!), Steve Cram, Hicham El Guerrouj.

Asbel Kiprop emerged as winner of the 8km junior race in Mombasa. Didn’t seem to hinder his progress to fourth in the 1500 at the 2007 world championship and the Olympic gold medal in Beijing the following year.

Reviving cross-country should be linked to reviving track distance running. Maybe more athletes would run the world cross-country if a top-30 pacing, say, on three per-nation basis was regarded as the equivalent of an A-standard for 5000/10,000 (the IAAF already regards a top-20 marathon finish in the world championships as an A-standard in that event).

That would certainly be a more accessible path into the track distance events than trying to get a start in the handful of 10,000 races run in sub-27:40 (men) or sub-31:45 (women).

In any case, once the racing is done in Punta Umbria next weekend, we’ll all have two years to reflect on the future of the world cross-country championships, the IAAF’s oldest world championship event.

Whatever solutions are proposed, they will surely founder without a renewed commitment from all parties to cross-country, and track distance running.

NZ: Is the World Cross Country a priority?

posted by rtross on April 6, 2010, 7:16pm


By Daniel Wallis

As the results from the 2010 Cross Country Championships in Poland were coming in, so too were the comments by New Zealand followers of the sport on the NZrun.com message board. After discussion ended on our top finishers and team results, an interesting discussion started. It wasn’t about how fast our guys and girls ran, or where they finished – but rather what they were wearing.
 
For over 100 years the black jersey and silver fern have been synonymous with New Zealand. From cricket to cycling - it’s what we wear, and its what we are proud of. There is one exception – and that’s the occasional white strip. However, the New Zealand team in Poland were kitted out in something unique: silver. My first thoughts were that Athletics New Zealand were throwing some spice into things – going trendy, or bringing a new swing to the ‘silver’ fern… Yet as discussion became more detailed it was obvious that this wasn’t about aesthetics - it was about status.
 
Last year Athletics New Zealand created a tier system, outlined within their High Performance program. Each event for which ANZ sends a representative is categorised into black, silver, and white singlet events. Representing New Zealand has now become far more complicated than simply putting on the black vest; each athlete is now graded depending on the status of the event he or she is competing in. Although the World Cross Country is widely considered the toughest race in the world, ANZ apparently didn’t get that memo – assigning our representatives this year a second class, silver singlet to wear on the world stage alongside those that are without doubt the worlds best distance runners.
 
NZRun.com co-founder Carl Jackson compared this situation to Karate - where only the best wear black. However, as Jackson commented, “aren’t we sending our best to World Cross?” If selection policies are not designed to send the best qualified, then what is the purpose? As it happens, ANZ has seemingly degraded the World XC as it is not funded by Sport and Recreation New Zealand (SPARC), with it not being an Olympic sport. Thus, now World Cross Country is not only a fully athlete-funded event, but now the athletes going apparently don’t even deserve to wear black – arguably New Zealand’s strongest brand and tradition.
 
A glance at ANZ’s high performance page: www.performance.athletics.org.nz, shows that this year there are only 3 Black Singlet Events: World Indoor Track & Field, World Junior Track & Field, and the Commonwealth Games. How a junior championship can be graded ahead of World Cross Country is beyond me, yet that is the present situation New Zealand finds itself in. World Cross, the IAAF World Half Marathon Champs, and the World Mountain Running Championships are all assigned the second-class status, while the Oceania Half Marathon Champs and TT21 Test-Match are two of the seven 3rd – tier events.
 
I understand the situation regarding funding and particular events being prioritised. No one in their right mind would argue that the Commonwealth Games are more prestigious than the Oceania Half Marathon Championships, but that status should be reflected in policy, not what colour singlet you wear. This isn’t karate, representing New Zealand is representing New Zealand, and that should mean the right to wear the black singlet. Imagine if the All Blacks suddenly came out and started doing this. They’d wear black against South Africa, silver against Argentina, and white for the shit games against Aussie and the Lions. Or maybe each player should be given a different colour? That way the opposition would always know the ‘weak’ or ‘non-funded’ links. Would they do this? No - because as was mentioned on NZRun.com – the black jersey is perhaps the All Blacks strongest brand and tradition.
 
For the first time in how-many-ever years, ANZ finally put out a policy that aimed at sending teams based on particular criteria. Yet despite all the drama around who would and would not go, it appears that Athletics NZ really doesn’t care about this event. Its self-funded, and the athletes don’t even deserve to wear black, rather some shitty shade of grey. How should this be perceived by other nations? Are they thinking: “well, this guy will be easy to beat, he’s obviously a B athlete”. What if Adrian Blincoe wanted to run World Cross? He’s good enough to wear black at the Olympics, but not at World Cross – what is that supposed to mean? Does it say more about the athlete or the meet he is at?
 
Athletics NZ needs a revamp – particularly with the disastrous number of registered athletes in the country - down from 5319 Senior Men registered in 1987 to 419 last year, yet instead they worrying about who wears what and where. What a joke.
 
Overall, cross-country has had quite the fall from grace in New Zealand. In 1975 the men’s team won Gold and the women’s team Bronze (albeit with an African representation of less than 7%, compared to almost 40% this year), meanwhile 25 years later athletes are buying their own uniform, tickets, and accommodation. Without grass-roots, domestic passion for cross-country, it seems unlikely that the event would survive at the top-level, with little incentive from ANZ to represent New Zealand at the Worlds toughest race.

launceston 10km

World Cross Country Eve: By Sonia O'Sullivan

posted by rtross on March 27, 2010, 8:25pm
It’s been a long time coming but finally we are only one sleep away from the World Cross Country 2010.
 
All the months of planning and preparation will be put to the test tomorrow around Myslecinek park, Bydgoszcz . The final preparations of the Australian team couldn’t have gone smoother, it has been a positive experience all around since we left Australia 10 days ago. Even the unexpected high temperatures during the week reverted to the conditions we expected to greet us in Poland, 4C wind, rain and plenty of mud! The gloves and hats are out and rain coats were all the rage today .
 
This afternoon was the final course inspection and thankfully we waited until the afternoon, as the transformation from the morning was like night and day. Wellington boots were the footwear of choice for non runners and they will be making another appearance tomorrow as the course has gone from good going all around to good going most of the way once you get through the opening 400m of close to un-runnable terrain. Most athletes skirted around this section today as it was enough information just to observe as the Wellie boot brigade slid through the ankle deep mud.
 
The sand banks around the jumps have washed away and it will be a giant step for many of the diminutive athletes to get over, without having to get down on all fours to clamber over……definitely a good viewing spot for the spectators and keen photographers.
 
The challenge has definitely been set on the course for all the athletes and it will be very interesting to see which athletes come out on top this year.
 
The Australian team didn’t seem too phased by the conditions and I feel that they are ready to take on the challenge, some are even embracing this very tough cross country course as just what they wanted and looking forward to getting stuck in tomorrow and taking on the World.

Australian World Cross Country team arrive in Poland

posted by rtross on March 26, 2010, 4:48am
By Sonia O'Sullivan

The Australian World cross country team arrived in Poland just as it was getting dark last evening. I went for a walk with Team Coach Tim O’Shaughnessy to find our bearings, however everything looked completely different in the morning, apart from the Miejski stadium landmark next to our appropriately named “Maraton” hotel.
 
We are within 2km of the course, so we took the opportunity to get a preview of the surface conditions before the official viewing on Saturday afternoon.
 
There are forests galore along the route to the Forest park, it is tempting to go exploring but needless to say all the athletes are cautiously sticking to the basic route and conserving all energy for Sunday.
 
Even though the course was not fully set up yet we were able to get a good idea of what it will look like on Sunday morning. Amazingly the course has a very similar outline to the course used in Brimbank park for the Australian selection trial. The only differences are the rough underfoot conditions and a couple of jumps that will need to be negotiated on each lap . The basic lap is 2Km, so there is plenty of opportunity for spectators to see the progress of the athletes on each lap. Even though the course is very flat with a couple of minor elevations I would consider this World cross country course to be very challenging for the athletes.
 
Already the spike length discussions are taking place but we will not make a final decision until Sunday morning when we know the conditions that the athletes will be faced with.
 
Bydgoszcz is a very pleasant town and it was even more pleasant today as we visited the town by tram with bright Sunshine and unseasonal temperatures above 20C. It is likely to be sunny and dry again tomorrow which will dry out the course a lot, but there is every possibility that the conditions we experienced on the course today will all change come Sunday if the forecasted rain comes our way on Saturday and Sunday.
 
We are sharing the Hotel with the Kenyan team so we are in good company, only problem being the speed that the bananas vanish when they are brought to the table. I may have to get up early tomorrow to ensure we have a supply for the weekend. Other than that the food is good, the team is happy and relaxed and the reality of the World Championship is fast approaching as we see the posters around town and more teams are starting to arrive.

The Flame

posted by rtross on October 7, 2009, 2:30am

Brought to you by Edward Ovadia who is in Berlin with official IAAF accreditation covering the championships for Runnerstribe.com

Watch out - the Australian athletics team has a new name and a new uniform. Stepping onto the track in Berlin for the first time ever will be 'The Flame', the new name for the collective Australian team. Introduced today, the idea of the team name is to help unite the athletics population, and the sport loving Australian population, behind a team which now has an identity.

The inspiration for the name 'The Flame' was the "burning ambition" of the Aussie athletes, said Athletics Australia CEO Danny Corcoran. "We now belive the time is right for our sport to have an identity. Something the public can get behind." In the same way that everyone knows who the Socceroos or the Wallabies are, hopefully the same will happen for our track and field team. "We wanted a name that was Australian. That young Australian kids will say: 'I want to be a member of this team'."

dani samuels In choosing they aimed for something that embodies the passion athletics brings out in people, the fire, the desire. "It's very exciting," said newly minted team captain Steve Hooker. "But what it means is up to us." Hopefully this team will be the ones to start a legacy.

The new uniforms are similar to the old ones in terms of the colour scheme. They went for something "uniquely Australian", which would help the team "stand out". Whether they achieved that is up to you. They're green and white, with the yellow and orange earthy trims which have featured before. And there's a lot of technology in the uniforms from a design point of view, hopefully to help the Aussies compete better.

It's clear that Athletics Australia is trying to create a sense of team spirit and an otherwise individual sport - which is certainly a good thing. It's time that more of the public got behind the sport, and creating a concrete team may be one way to aid that. "You're part of the Flame, now."

 

 


Share on Facebook Runnerstribe is on Twitter
 

 

 

'Hills are speedword in diguise '
Frank Shorter

Steve Hooker Interview - Injured

posted by rtross on October 7, 2009, 2:23am

Runnerstribe: Steve, we heard you had an injury recently, how's it coming along?

Steve Hooker: Well I had an MRI last night, which found a bit of tear in my right adductor, so it's going to be hard work to get back for the qualifying round, but the aim is to get back there and see how it goes.

RT: When did you hurt yourself, how did it happen?

SH: It was in training, on Monday.

Steve Hooker RT: So you're still not sure if you'll compete at all?

SH: Yeah, if I'm not 100% right by the time the qualifying round comes around, I won't be competing, it's not worth risking it.

RT: How have you found this year so far after winning the gold last year?

SH:It's been interesting, I had a very good indoor season and Australian season, it's been a bit of a challenge in the outdoor season, I felt like I was in good shape but it hasn't quite been there. Some of that is partly due to jumping in conditions that aren't ideal to pole vaulting, or not quite having felt 100%. But my last training session before I hurt myself I felt like I was running and pole vaulting as well as I ever have.

RT:Aside from you, who are the others in the field to look out for?

SH:I think the man to beat is Renaud Lavillenie, the young French pole vaulter, he's very consistently been jumping over 5.80m. He's the guy to beat at the moment, and the remaining medals will be a battle amoung others.

RT:How long until you're back to 100%?

SH: It's a grade one, so three weeks. It's just bad timing. Long term there's no concern, it's just really unfortunate timing!

RT:Well we hope you recover in time!

 

 


Share on Facebook Runnerstribe is on Twitter
 

 

 

'Hills are speedword in disguise '
Frank Shorter

Women's 10k and Men's Preview?

posted by rtross on October 7, 2009, 1:58am
By Bryan Green (Twitter: @bryangreen1)

I don't think we could have scripted a better ending to that women's 10,000 meter final.  Tactical race, broken open by five Africans with 3000 meters to go.  All five runners still together with one lap to go.  The linet masai Ethiopians looking for a sweep.  The Kenyans looking for their first victory in 10 years.  Three runners still in it with 100 meters to go.  The young Kenyan gets dropped.  The #1 contender is stumbling and struggling.  The favorite looks to have the race wrapped up.

And then...the kind of finish we'd scoff at if it was put at the end of a movie.  "Oh, come on," we'd say.  "Too unrealistic."

It was certainly a Hollywood finish, though I'm not sure the audiences in Addis Ababa are going to be thrilled with the surprise twist.  While Linet Masai gets to play the part of the fairy tale princess, Melkamu is stuck playing the role of girl who let the guy get away.  As for Defar, she ended up one of the victims in a bad horror movie.  That's the thing about track, it's all improv, and some endings are happier than others.

For the two of you who might be reading this without having seen it or read any other reviews, at thirty meters out Meseret Defar's body goes into rigor mortis and she basically stops moving.  Meselech Melkamu storms past her for the sure win and eases in the last few meters, throwing her arms up in apparent victory.  All the while Linet Masai, the 19 year-old Kenyan who was dropped with 100 meters to go, never gives up and storms back to get the win at the very last possible moment.  It was awesome.  As far as 10,000 meter races go, the only race that I vividly remember being this exciting was the Gebrselassie-Tergat battle in Sydney. 

Aside from an odd incident at the start where all of the women in the outer lanes cut in too early, the race played out pretty much as one might have expected.  Sure, we Americans and a few Kiwis and Japanese were no doubt hoping to see one of their contingent in the mix at the end, but that was always going to be a low probability event.  If you took out the first and last 30 meters of the race, it went pretty much to plan.  But boy did that last 30 meters matter!

As I watched the race I started to wonder, could this be but a preview of the men's race?  Look at the cast of characters and you see it stacks up pretty similarly: Kenenisa Bekele

Meseret Defar = Kenenisa Bekele
Meselech Melkamu = Gebre Gebremariam
Wude Ayalew = Abebe Dinkessa
Tirunesh Dibaba = Sileshi Sihine
Linet Masai = Moses Masai (hey, they're siblings)
Grace Momanyi = Micah Kogo
Lornah Kiplagat = Bernard Kipyego
Amy Yoder Begley = Dathan Ritzenhein
Shalane Flanagan = Galen Rupp
Katie McGregor = Tim Nelson
Kim Smith = Collis Birmingham
Yurika Nakamura = Yuki Sato
Ines Monteiro = Juan Luis Barrios
Elvan Abeylegesse = Zersenay Tadesse

Did I say "pretty similarly"?  I meant, "uncannily".  So maybe the race goes out tactically, with random runners leading a slow pace through 7,000 meters.  And then Moses Masai and Micah Kogo get impatient and make a big break, with all three Ethiopians following.  Everyone expects Rupp, Ritz, Birmingham, Sato or Barrios to at least make the effort to go with them, but for some reason they don't.  They settle for racing themselves in the second pack.  The Africans run tight until the big sprint, where Bekele pulls ahead and looks to have it won.

And then...Bekele rigs, Gebremariam thinks he's won his first title until Moses Masai catches him at the last second!  Rupp fades after a long NCAA season.  Ritz, Sato and Birmingham battle it out for the title of "best of the rest".  Zersenay Tadesse drops out a la Abeylegesse, Sihine sits at home thinking that HE would have retained the title for Ethiopia, and everyone's fantasy picks get blown out of the water with Bekele's loss.  Seriously, with Bekele involved, the sequel could be even more dramatic.

Yeah...it's completely unrealistic.  Then again, if Bekele's going to lose, would it be any other way?  If anyone's going to make a big move, wouldn't it be the Kenyans?  Would it really be a big surprise if Ritz outran Rupp, given the nature of their years up to this point?  Yeah, it's completely unrealistic.

So here's what I actually think will happen.  I think the pace will be pedal to the metal pretty early on.  I think the field will string out and everyone's going to ride collis birmingham the train for as long as they can.  I don't think there's going to be one big break like there was in the women's race, but rather a lot of little surges and a gradual increase in intensity.  I think Rupp is going to run the race we all hoped Flanagan would run--and he'll keep his nose in it for as long as he can--but I don't think it'll be enough for a medal, more like 5th to 7th.  I think Bekele will judge his kick correctly, and that the biggest battle will be for silver, given Sihine won't be running.  I think that battle will be fought by Tadesse, Kogo and Dinkessa, with them finishing in that order.  And nobody will ever remember that the men's race could have been so similar to the women's...alas.

My final thought about the women's race: the only thing I would have liked to see that didn't happen was an American go with the Africans when they made their move.  But looking back on it, Flanagan wasn't ready and even if Begley had gone, I doubt she would have been competitive.  I think she made the right choice to hang back and focus on winning her "race within the race".  She remained positive and competitive, she beat a number of world class runners head-to-head, and she got a nice PR (31:13.78) that moved her to #4 all-time in the US, too.  Not too shabby.

And in case you're wondering what it will take for Ritz or Rupp to match Begley's performance, they'll have to run faster than the current US #4--27:25.61--set by none other than their coach, Alberto Salazar.


 

 


Share on Facebook Runnerstribe is on Twitter
 

 

 

'Hills are speedword in disguise '
Frank Shorter

1500m - Sydney Olympics Men's Final

posted by rtross on October 4, 2009, 11:37pm

1500m - Sydney Olympics Men's Final

 


Recent Articles